Behind the Headlines: What’s Happening with ICE and Recent Shootings in America
By Candid Brief News | CandidBrief.com | Jan 25 , 2026
Recent events in the United States have put federal immigration enforcement, and especially the role of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol under intense public scrutiny. In January 2026, two high-profile incidents in Minneapolis involving fatal shootings by federal agents drew widespread attention, protests, and calls for reform.
Two Fatal Shootings in Minneapolis
On January 24, 2026, federal immigration agents were involved in a confrontation in Minneapolis that ended with the shooting death of a 37-year-old man identified as Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a registered intensive care unit nurse and U.S. citizen. Reports indicate that the incident occurred during a federal enforcement operation in the city, described by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as part of a broader immigration crackdown. According to federal officials, agents fired after asserting that Pretti approached them with a weapon, though video evidence reviewed by multiple news organizations shows differing accounts of the interaction and suggests he was holding only a phone at the time. The event quickly sparked protests and public debate about use of force and federal authority.
Less than three weeks earlier, on January 7, 2026, another Minneapolis resident, Renée Nicole Good, 37, was fatally shot by an ICE officer during an immigration enforcement operation. Witness accounts and media reporting noted that she was in her vehicle when the shooting occurred, and subsequent reporting showed internal investigations and conflicting narratives over what led to the use of deadly force.
Rising Tensions and Public Response
These two incidents are part of a larger federal initiative in the Twin Cities known as Operation Metro Surge, an expansive immigration enforcement effort that began in late 2025. The operation has involved thousands of agents from ICE, Border Patrol, and other DHS components, with the stated goal of apprehending and deporting individuals living in the country without legal status.
However, critics, including local officials, civil rights groups, and community members, have raised concerns about the tactics used during enforcement actions, the frequency of confrontations, and the transparency of federal operations. In response to the shootings in Minneapolis, large protests took place not only in Minnesota but also in cities such as New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, where demonstrators demanded accountability, policy changes, and limits on aggressive enforcement strategies.
Official Statements and Government Actions
Public officials have reacted strongly to the incidents. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz publicly criticized the federal response and called for actions to reduce tensions between local communities and enforcement agencies. Lawmakers at the state and national levels have weighed in on both sides of the debate, with some condemning perceived abuses and others emphasizing the role of federal law enforcement in upholding immigration law.
Federal authorities maintain that their operations are lawful and necessary, and that agents are trained to handle dangerous situations. Statements from DHS and Customs and Border Protection have defended the actions of their personnel, asserting that use of force is justified when agents face immediate threats.
What This Means Going Forward
The unfolding situation highlights ongoing tensions in the United States over immigration enforcement, federal authority, public safety, and civil rights. As federal operations continue and as local reactions grow, policymakers and communities alike are confronting the challenge of balancing law enforcement goals with public trust and accountability.
Disclosure: This article is based on publicly available information and coverage by other news outlets, independently summarized and rewritten by CandidBrief.
Related coverage on regional security developments is available on CandidBrief.com